A resurfaced political critique argues Obama deliberately avoided labeling ISIS and similar groups as "radical Islam," framing it as bad for honest terrorism discussion and good for a broader political agenda favoring weak religious identity.

• Obama avoided the term "radical Islam" even during ISIS atrocities against Christians and historical sites.
• Critics argue this was because strong religious faith is seen as a threat to a broader globalist political push.
• The refusal is tied to a wider reluctance to criticize groups viewed as "protected classes," avoiding generalizations about religion.
• The framing suggests language policing shaped how terrorism was officially described under Obama.

Outlook: This remains a recurring talking point in conservative media revisiting Obama-era rhetoric on terrorism and Islam.