A high-profile Cornell sexual assault case is drawing public pushback, and the fight is now over text messages and a three-week delay in reporting.

• Critics point to the gap between the alleged night and the report to campus police as a reason to doubt the account.
• Messages said to be from the accuser early on reportedly described nothing illegal and said she enjoyed part of the night.
• The counter-argument is about drinking: if being drunk means someone cannot consent, the same standard should apply to the men, some of whom were said to be drunker.
• Supporters of the accuser say none of that cancels out an assault, and the personal-responsibility framing shifts blame onto the victim.

Outlook: The case likely hinges on what the full text history and timeline show, and the public argument will stay ugly until more of that record comes out.