Joe Rogan's hope that AI could one day take over government and diplomacy to end war is being dismissed as naive, with critics arguing conflict is baked into human progress and AI would only reflect whoever programs it.

• Rogan told physicist Carlo Rovelli he hopes humanity eventually hands government and foreign relations to AI, arguing humans have a disastrous track record and AI could stop all wars.
• Critics call the idea utopian nonsense: whoever types the instructions still sets the agenda, so an AI told to be aggressive with Iran would just bake conflict in.
• Progress itself breeds conflict, so removing conflict likely means removing progress, and a war-free AI-run world could look like a docile dystopia.
• A separate worry is that AI is eroding people's ability to think for themselves, from students fact-checking debates on their phones to companies outsourcing marketing and press releases to prompts.
• Trump is faulted for downplaying AI safety and saying things will work out on their own.

Outlook: Expect the AI-governance debate to keep heating up, but no one in politics or business is treating Rogan's idea as a serious near-term proposal.