PBD challenges Candace Owens' "0% chance" claim in the Charlie Kirk case
A public split is growing among right-wing commentators over whether the man in custody for Charlie Kirk's killing is guilty, with Candace Owens' certainty drawing pushback.
- Owens has said there is a 0% chance the man in jail is the killer.
- The counter-argument: if he were innocent, his family and partner would not have turned him in and would be publicly fighting the case.
- His own family reportedly says otherwise, which undercuts the wrongful-conviction claim.
- He allegedly told hospital staff he was supposed to be paid for the killing but never got the money.
- Those medical workers are being pointed to as key witnesses who should be called to testify.
Outlook: The dispute will likely stay unsettled until the trial puts the evidence and witnesses on the record.