Legal analyst Baron Coleman lays out why the case against Charlie Kirk's accused killer looks shaky, which is bad news for prosecutors and raises alarming questions about government conduct.

• The FBI seized key evidence — the gun, bullets, fingerprints, DNA — and 10 months later still won't let the defense examine it, even warning that further testing might destroy the bullets.
• The official story keeps shifting: whether the rifle was taken apart, where a screwdriver was found, and how a body camera conveniently died right before the officer reached it.
• Fingerprints and DNA at the scene did not match Tyler Robinson, and there is no clear video, no cell data proving he was there, and no medical examiner testimony at the hearing.
• Prosecutors are reportedly not confident they can win, and the crime scene was dug up and paved over less than a day after the shooting.
• Coleman frames it as binary: either Robinson acted alone, or it points to a multi-agency government cover-up reaching the highest levels.

Outlook: The case heads toward a fight over evidence access, and without a solid link placing Robinson at the scene, a conviction is far from certain.